(2) The defendant committed the murder by the unlawful detonation
of an explosive with intent to injure person or damage property.
(3) The defendant committed the murder by lying in wait.
(4) The defendant who committed the murder was hired to kill.
(5) The defendant committed the murder by hiring another person
to kill.
(6) The victim of the murder was a corrections employee, probation
officer, parole officer, community corrections worker, home detention
officer, fireman, judge, or law enforcement officer, and either:
(A) the victim was acting in the course of duty; or
(B) the murder was motivated by an act the victim performed while
acting in the course of duty.
(7) The defendant has been convicted of another murder.
(8) The defendant has committed another murder, at any time, regardless
of whether the defendant has been convicted of that other murder.
(9) The defendant was:
(A) under the custody of the department of correction;
(B) under the custody of a county sheriff;
(C) on probation after receiving a sentence for the commission of
a felony; or
(D) on parole; at the time the murder was committed.
(10) The defendant dismembered the victim.
(11) The defendant burned, mutilated, or tortured the victim while
the victim was alive.
(12) The victim of the murder was less than twelve (12) years of age.
(13) The victim was a victim of any of the following offenses for
which the defendant was convicted:
(A) Battery as a Class D felony or as a Class C felony
under IC 35-42-2-1.
(B) Kidnapping (IC 35-42-3-2).
(C) Criminal confinement (IC 35-42-3-3).
(D) A sex crime under IC 35-42-4.
(14) The victim of the murder was listed by the state or known by
the defendant to be a witness against the defendant and the defendant
committed the murder with the intent to prevent the person from testifying.
(15) The defendant committed the murder by intentionally discharging
a firearm (as defined by IC 35-47-1-5):
(A) into an inhabited dwelling; or
(B) from a vehicle.
(16) The victim of the murder was pregnant and the murder resulted in the intentional killing of a fetus that has attained viability (as defined in IC 16-18-2-365).
(c) The mitigating circumstances that may be considered under this
section are as follows:
(1) The defendant has no significant history of prior criminal conduct.
(2) The defendant was under the influence of extreme mental or emotional
disturbance when the murder was committed.
(3) The victim was a participant in, or consented to, the defendant's
conduct.
(4) The defendant was an accomplice in a murder committed by another
person, and the defendant's participation was relatively minor.
(5) The defendant acted under the substantial domination of another
person.
(6) The defendant's capacity to appreciate the criminality of the
defendant's conduct or to conform that conduct to the requirements
of law was substantially impaired as a result of mental disease or
defect or of intoxication.
(7) The defendant was less than eighteen (18) years of age at the
time the murder was committed.
(8) Any other circumstances appropriate for consideration.
(d) If the defendant was convicted of murder in a jury trial, the
jury shall reconvene for the sentencing hearing. If the trial was
to the court, or the judgment was entered on a guilty plea, the court
alone shall conduct the sentencing hearing. The jury or the court
may consider all the evidence introduced at the trial stage of the
proceedings, together with new evidence presented at the sentencing
hearing. The court shall instruct the jury concerning the statutory
penalties for murder and any other offenses for which the defendant
was convicted, the potential for consecutive or concurrent sentencing,
and the availability of good time credit and clemency. The court shall instruct the jury that, in order for the jury to recommend to the court that the death penalty or life imprisonment without parole should be imposed, the jury must find at least one (1) aggravating circumstance beyond a reasonable doubt as described in subsection (l) and shall provide a special verdict form for each aggravating circumstance alleged. The defendant
may present any additional evidence relevant to:
(1) the aggravating circumstances alleged; or
(2) any of the mitigating circumstances listed in subsection (c).
(e) For a defendant sentenced after June 30, 2002, except as provided by IC 35-36-9, if the hearing is by jury,
the jury shall recommend to the court whether the death penalty
or life imprisonment without parole, or neither, should be imposed.
The jury may recommend:
(1) the death penalty; or
(2) life imprisonment without parole; only if it makes the findings
described in subsection (l). If the jury reaches a sentencing recommendation, the court shall sentence the defendant accordingly. After a court pronounces sentence, a representative of the victim’s family and friends may present a statement regarding the impact of the crime on family and friends. The impact statement may be submitted in writing or given orally by the representative. The statement shall be given in the presence of the defendant.
(f) If a jury is unable to agree on a sentence recommendation
after reasonable deliberations, the court shall discharge the jury
and proceed as if the hearing had been to the court alone.
(g) If the hearing is to the court alone, except as provided by
IC 35-36-9, the court shall:
(1) sentence the defendant to death; or
(2) impose a term of life imprisonment without parole; only if
it makes the findings described in subsection (l).
(h) If a court sentences the defendant to death, the court shall
order the defendant's execution to be carried out not later than
one (1) year and one (1) day after the date the defendant was convicted.
The supreme court has exclusive jurisdiction to stay the execution
of a death sentence. If the supreme court stays the execution of
a death sentence, the supreme court shall order a new date for the
defendant's execution.
(I) If a person sentenced to death by a court files a petition
for post-conviction relief, the court, not later than ninety (90)
days after the date the petition is filed, shall set a date to hold
a hearing to consider the petition. If the court does not, within
the ninety (90) day period, set the date to hold the hearing to
consider the petition, the court's failure to set the hearing date
is not a basis for additional post-conviction relief. The attorney
general shall answer the petition for post-conviction relief on
behalf of the state. At the request of the attorney general, a prosecuting
attorney shall assist the attorney general. The court shall enter
written findings of fact and conclusions of law concerning the petition
not later than ninety (90) days after the date the hearing concludes.
However, if the court determines that the petition is without merit,
the court may dismiss the petition within ninety (90) days without
conducting a hearing under this subsection.
(j) A death sentence is subject to automatic review by the supreme
court. The review, which shall be heard under rules adopted by the
supreme court, shall be given priority over all other cases. The
supreme court's review must take into consideration all claims that
the:
(1) conviction or sentence was in violation of the:
(A) Constitution of the State of Indiana; or
(B) Constitution of the United States;
(2) sentencing court was without jurisdiction to impose a sentence;
and
(3) sentence:
(A) exceeds the maximum sentence authorized by law; or
(B) is otherwise erroneous.
If the supreme court cannot complete its review by the date set by
the sentencing court for the defendant's execution under subsection
(h), the supreme court shall stay the execution of the death sentence
and set a new date to carry out the defendant's execution.
(k) A person who has been sentenced to death and who has completed state post-conviction review proceedings may file a written petition with the supreme court seeking to present new evidence challenging the person's guilt or the appropriateness of the death sentence if the person serves notice on the attorney general. The supreme court shall determine, with or without a hearing, whether the person has presented previously undiscovered evidence that undermines confidence in the conviction or the death sentence. If necessary, the supreme court may remand the case to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing to consider the new evidence and its effect on the person's conviction and death sentence. The supreme court may not make a determination in the person's favor nor make a decision to remand the case to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing without first providing the attorney general with an opportunity to be heard on the matter.
(l) Before a sentence may be imposed under this section, the jury,
in a proceeding under subsection (e), or the court, in a proceeding
under subsection (g), must find that:
(1) the state has proved beyond a reasonable doubt that
at least one (1) of the aggravating circumstances listed in subsection
(b) exists; and
(2) any mitigating circumstances that exist are outweighed by
the aggravating circumstance or circumstances.
[As added by Acts 1977, P.L.340, SEC. 122; Amended by P.L.336-1983,
SEC.1; P.L.212-1986, SEC. 1; P.L.332-1987, SEC. 2; P.L.320-1987,
SEC. 2; P.L.296-1989, SEC. 2; P.L.138-1989, SEC. 6; P.L.1- 1990,
SEC. 354; P.L.230-1993, SEC. 5; P.L.250-1993, SEC. 2; P.L.158-1994,
SEC. 7; P.L.306-1995, SEC. 1; P.L.216-1996, SEC. 25; P.L.228-1996,
SEC. 1; P.L.261-1997, SEC. 7.; P.L.80-2002, SEC.1; P.L.117-2002, SEC.2; P.L. 147-2003, § 1; P.L. 1-2006, § 550, P.L.99-2007, SEC.213..]
[Formerly: IC 35-13-4-1; IC 35-21-4-3; Acts 1941, P.L.148,
SEC. 1.]
2007 - P.L. 99, § 213 (effective May 2, 2007)
- Under subsection (a), changed "mentally retarded an individual" to "an individual with mental retardation."
2006 - P.L. 1, § 550 (effective March 24, 2006)
- Under subsection (d), changed reference from subsection (k) to subsection (l), to be consistent with 2003 change moving the former subsection (k) to subsection (l).
2003 - P.L. 147, § 1 (effective July 1, 2003)
- Added new subsection (k), authorizing the defendant, after state post-conviction review, to file a petition directly to the Indiana Supreme Court challenging guilt or death sentence based upon “new evidence.”
2002 - P.L. 80, § 1 (effective upon passage)
- Allows for victim impact statement “after a court pronounces sentence.” (Applies to any murder conviction obtained after passage).
2002 - P.L. 117, § 1 (effective July 1, 2002)
- Increases the minimum age of eligibility for a death sentence from 16 to 18 years “at the time the murder was committed.” Minimum age for Life Without Parole remains at 18 years. (Amending IC 35-50-2-3)
2002 - P.L. 117, § 2 (effective July 1, 2002)
- Requires a special verdict form for each aggravating circumstance alleged.
Eliminates judicial override; requires the court to sentence in accordance with jury verdict. (Applies to any sentencing after June 30, 2002.
1997 - P.L. 261, § 7 (effective Jan 22, 1998)
(Vetoed by Governor O’Bannon May 12, 1997 - Passed over veto January 22, 1998)
- Added intentional killing of a viable fetus carried by murder victim as an aggravating circumstance under (B) (16).
1996 - P.L. 216, § 25 (effective July 1, 1996)
- Allows the court to receive victim impact evidence after jury recommendation.
1996 - P.L. 228, §1 (effective July 1, 1996)
- Added burning, mutilation, or torture of the victim while alive as aggravating circumstance under (B) (11).
- Renumbers B (11) (Victim < 12 years old) to B (12).
- Renumbers B (12) (Victim was prior victim of defendant convicted of felony battery, kidnapping, confinement, or sex crime) to B (13).
- Renumbers B (13) (Victim was witness against defendant) to B (14).
- Renumbers B (14) (Drive-By shootings) to B (15).
1995 - P.L.306, § 1 (effective July 1, 1995)
- Added provisions requiring execution within 1 year and a day after sentencing, which can only be stayed by the Indiana Supreme Court.
- Added provisions commanding the Attorney General to answer PCR petitions on behalf of state. Prosecutor must assist if requested.
- Requires trial court to set hearing on PCR within 90 days after Petition filed; and must rule on PCR within 90 days after hearing.
- Requires the Indiana Supreme Court to consider all possible claims of error on direct appeal.
- See also P.L. 294-1995; § 1 (amending IC 35-38-6-1) Changes the method of execution from electrocution to lethal injection.
1994 - P.L. 158, § 7
- Added provisions allowing State to seek Life Without Parole without seeking a death sentence, but with the same procedures and burdens.
- Added Criminal Gang Activity to the list of crimes eligible under (B) (1).
- Added provisions prohibiting State from seeking death sentence where the defendant is mentally retarded.
- Added drive-by shootings as aggravating circumstance under (B) (14).
1993 - P.L. 230, § 5
- Added Carjacking to the list of crimes eligible under (B) (1).
1993 - P.L. 250, § 2
- Added probation officer, parole officer, community corrections officer, and home detention officer to list of victims under (B) (6) aggravating circumstance.
- Added requirement under (d) that jury be instructed as to full range of possible penalties for murder, including consecutive sentences, good time, and clemency.
- Added jury option of recommending Life Without Parole under (e) and (g), under same standards as required for recommendation of death.
1993 - P.L. 250, § 3
- "IC 35-50-2-3 and IC 35-50-2-9, as amended by this act, only apply to murders committed after June 30, 1993."
1990 - P.L. 1, § 354 (effective upon passage March 20, 1990)
- Corrected statutory citations for Kidnapping and Confinement under (B) (12).
1989 - P.L. 138, § 6
- Amended statute without apparent change.
1989 - P.L. 296, § 2
- Added Dealing in Cocaine or Narcotic Drug to the list of crimes eligible under (B) (1).
- Added statutory citations to crimes listed under (B) (1).
- Repealed the former (B) (9) and (B) (10) relating to murders committed while imprisoned, and added a new aggravating circumstance under (B) (9) relating to murders committed while imprisoned, on probation, or on parole.
- Renumbers (B) (11) (dismemberment of victim) as (B) (10).
- Renumbers (B) (12) victim less than 12 years as (B) (11).
- Added aggravating circumstance under (B) (12) where the defendant is convicted of Battery, Kidnapping, Confinement, or a sex crime upon the murder victim.
1989 - P.L. 296, § 3
- "This act does not apply to an offense that is committed before July 1, 1989."
1987 - P.L. 320, § 2
- Added aggravating circumstance under (B) (12) where murder victim is less than 12 years of age.
1987 - P.L. 332, § 2
- Corrected statute to include gender-neutral language.
- Added mitigating circumstance under (C)(7) if the defendant is less than 18 years of age.
1987 - P.L. 332, § 3
- "This act does not apply to a case in which a death sentence has been imposed before September 1, 1987."
1986 - P.L. 212, § 1
- Added aggravating circumstance under (B) (11) where the murder victim is dismembered.
1983 - P.L. 336, § 1
- Added aggravating circumstance under (B) (10) where murder committed while the defendant is imprisoned with 20 or more years remaining on sentence to serve.
1983 - P.L. 336, § 2
- "This act takes effect June 1, 1983."
1977 - P.L. 340, § 122
- Established new death sentence statute, in compliance with recent decisions of U.S. Supreme Court, enumerating aggravating circumstances and requiring the State to prove at least one aggravating circumstance beyond a reasonable doubt, and that any mitigating circumstances are outweighed by the aggravating circumstance(s).
- Repeals the former IC 35-13-4-1.
1973 - P.L. 328, § 1
- Established mandatory death sentence upon conviction of First Degree Murder where aggravating circumstances exist.
1971 - P.L. 454, § 1
- Established life imprisonment or a death sentence as jury penalty options upon conviction of First Degree Murder, where explosives used or underlying Rape, Arson, Burglary or Robbery committed.
1941 - P.L. 148, § 1.